Model coverage and accuracy.

Latest geometry unavailable in source model

Environmental assessment approval on June 5,2026 does not establish construction or funding. Use approved shoreline geometry only.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ. Receivership alone is not a basis to delete a proposal; record remains conditional.

Site marked; the six new townhomes need verified current building drawings. Nearby existing buildings are retained.

Exact current proposed exterior/footprint/dimensions not yet verified. Existing municipal roofs are context, not the new design.

Plan-derived stepped envelope with source-backed lower floors and MPH

I worked from the May 2026 floor plans and elevations. The model keeps the major steps, courtyard and townhouse rows; windows, balconies, finishes and small roof details are simplified or omitted. Placement has roughly 3 m working uncertainty. Source roof levels are retained while displayed foundations meet the atlas terrain; this is not certified survey geometry. Council material reports 553 apartments plus 34 townhomes, while the May site and ground sheets show four northern rows with 8, 6, 6 and 8 homes, alongside differing residential and parking schedules. The model follows the visible plan forms; a current approved unit schedule is still needed to reconcile those counts.

Survey-registered plan-derived schematic envelope

The revised scheme has eight residential storeys plus a ninth-level mechanical and indoor amenity enclosure. It replaces the old 11-storey source proposal, not a completed building. ASL levels are taken directly from section AA: residential ground 79.19, retail ground 78.38, main roof 105.19 and mechanical/amenity roof 109.69 m. Northern facade recess, rooftop setback, front terraces and rear ground-level open parking are simplified from current plans. Terrace slabs on levels 3–8 follow the plan footprints. Their 0.18 m thickness is only a display convention; railings, columns, facade glazing, Juliette guards and small entrance canopies are omitted. The municipal summary still describes the older 11-storey application; the actual dated October 2025 drawing set governs this geometry. The two ground cores are simplified outer envelopes. Interior ramps and parking structures are omitted.

plan-derived model

March 2026 proposal envelope, not an approved or built outcome. Exact written heights and main floorplate dimensions; podium and rooftop screen traced from published plan vectors. Registration uses survey controls and existing-tower corners (allow ±1 m position, not a statistical confidence interval). Screen thickness, floor bands and materials are illustrative. Individual balconies, window divisions, recessed entries and equipment are omitted. Datum treated as local NAD 83 UTM 17; no sub-metre geodetic claim.

source-based exterior improvement

Historical/drawn exterior study, approximately registered. Native dimensions not rescaled. Ground interpolated; current built design not verified.

Site marked; earlier nine-storey zoning is verified. The current 85-home building shape is still being checked.

Exact current proposed exterior/footprint/dimensions not yet verified. Existing municipal roofs are context, not the new design.

source-based exterior improvement

Historical/drawn exterior study, approximately registered. Entrance and garage now face northeast toward Aldo Drive, checked against aerial imagery and the City 2024 roof footprint on 10 October 2026. Native dimensions and finishes are preserved; ground and current built details remain unverified.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ.

Source-registered settlement zoning-envelope schematic

This is the maximum permitted settlement zoning envelope, not an architectural design or a verified finished facade. Contours follow the actual settlement diagram rather than stretching a superseded City model. The height-zone surfaces are independently extruded; coincident hidden surfaces remain. Cladding, railings, detailed balconies, structural openings and landscaping are not inferred. Building base is the median sampled Ontario DTM grade, not a legally calculated or approved established grade. Relative maximum heights are taken verbatim from the governing diagram. February 2025 approval is in principle, with the final order withheld pending conditions and draft zoning schedules subject to City technical review. No later complete architectural set was publicly recovered. The settlement specifies a 12-storey slab, replacing the former 15-storey/17-with-rooftop tower. The slab has a 42 m maximum and the delineated mechanical/amenity area a 48 m maximum. The rooftop mechanical/amenity footprint extends to the western boundary in the source diagram; its permitted envelope is modelled above the 42 m slab, with that overhang retained. Thin same-height stepback lines on the 42 m area are retained only as the overall maximum envelope because the zoning graphic does not assign separate floor elevations to them.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ. Sajecki Planning reports OPA and zoning approval in April 2024; the municipal active page still says under review. This does not establish a construction start.

Geometry conflict or version uncertainty; inspect evidence

The City active-application register as of June 30, 2026 describes two towers of 40 and 60 storeys with an eight-storey podium. A published 2023 revision gives 71 and 46 storeys, with heights of 230.15 m and 155.40 m. Municipal mesh attributes of 135.995 m and 195.595 m do not match that revision. The current register may retain older wording; no dated approved elevation resolves the conflict. Retain the source meshes with a version warning and remove the preliminary definitive supersession claim.

Plan-derived exterior envelope

The July 2026 drawings support the main floor outlines and roof levels. Balconies, finishes, small roof equipment and the parking-ramp cover are omitted. Placement has roughly 3 m working uncertainty. The existing apartment buildings are retained. Displayed foundations follow terrain; approved grading and vertical-datum agreement remain unverified.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

The stated metric heights are the architectural building-height dimensions, excluding additional mechanical penthouse height. The City overview still describes the older 29/27/25/23-storey proposal.

Current approved-plan massing; schematic roof envelopes

The current revised plan supports the apartment and eight townhouse blocks. Roof details, upper setbacks and finishes are simplified, with approximately 5 m placement uncertainty. Ground levels are estimates. The appeal period and holding conditions remain; no construction completion is claimed.

Site marked; the plans show seven new houses and one retained house. Their roof designs and actual heights are not yet verified.

Published concept and subdivision plans show footprints and lots, but no individual architectural elevations or actual heights were recovered. The 10.7 m draft ridge limit is a zoning cap, not the design height. Any 3D reconstruction must be a clearly labelled footprint or zoning study, or remain source-linked on the site pending architecture. Preserve the existing retained house and natural-heritage buffers.

New public-plan-derived schematic now available

Plan-derived model of the May 2026 rezoning submission, not approval or as-built work. Envelopes and datum heights follow BDP Quadrangle plans. Digitised georegistration to two existing City buildings has estimated ±3 m placement uncertainty. Balcony curves and slab thickness are simplified from published typical floor plans; no surveyed facade or material claim.

City-source building shape and dated-photo frontage study, with separate approximate ground support.

Dated-photo frontage study on exact generalized City shell. Added openings and finish dimensions are visual estimates. The separate foundation skirt is a schematic display contact correction, not a measured historic foundation. The supplied image has an embedded June 8, 2018 timestamp. Metadata does not independently certify capture date or current conditions. Current storefront and hidden elevations are not independently confirmed.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

No floor count is inferred from the mesh height. Existing apartment buildings must remain in the base model.

Plan-derived schematic envelope

Three podium/shaft extents and mechanical enclosure follow the site-plan outline and labelled level elevations. Minor podium recesses, balcony projections, cladding, windows and ground-level openings are omitted. Aerial massing is more complete than the prior absent building, but this is not a fabrication-ready architectural model.

Existing City buildings are already shown. Current roof and terrace details remain to be compared with the newer plans.

Retained municipal massing is dated source geometry. Current plans add roof and terrace details that have not been individually reconstructed. Do not present the earlier webpage count of 20 townhomes or generic source height fields as the latest design heights. No new building permission, construction or completion date was verified.

Approved envelope massing; final architecture unverified

The towers follow approved zoning envelopes; podium outlines and ground levels are approximate. Final façades and construction timing remain unverified.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Address changes do not imply a new project. Exact OZ 21-5 identity matches the City mesh; detailed architectural currency remains unverified.

Current 2026 geometry awaited

The older 2025 set cannot be presented as the latest design. This site remains an evidence/navigation record until current geometry arrives.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ. Floor-count convention excludes the mechanical penthouse from occupied-storey total; 133 m City massing is not proof of full latest architectural fidelity.

Latest geometry unavailable in source model

Do not retain the superseded mixed-use building as a future tower.85 affordable rental units mentioned in funding material are not 85 separate townhouse buildings.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

The 2021 letter has 4,277 units, while later records have 3,523. Tower names and heights vary by version. Municipal SP 22-139 geometry attributes are 200.15, 182.45, 176.25, 191 and 161.2 m; these are not independently confirmed architectural heights. No official cancellation was found.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Municipal data has both 3600 Hurontario, SP 25-3, and Enfield Place II, SP 25-21, on adjacent portions of the site. They may be phases or versions; do not infer two confirmed towers until their plans are reconciled. The 2024 City record references the older SP 09-27.

Latest geometry unavailable in source model

No formal application was verified. Site clearance alone does not establish tower construction. Keep it off the default model and label any optional display as a concept.

Optional dated 2024 architectural reference; 2025 ground study shown separately

This detailed source-based study reconstructs the April 12, 2024 KPMB drawings published as the September 2024 submission. Both buildings are 12 storeys and 43.8 m from the documented established grades to mechanical top. Individual windows follow the documented repeated bay rhythm; frame depths, rail details and exact material tones remain approximate. Curved roof enclosures follow the roof plan, which takes precedence over illustrative render imagery. The March 21, 2025 site plan changes the ground outlines and Building 1 FFE from 137.40 to 137.50 m; no current upper-floor drawings or elevations were recovered. This dated model must not be asserted to reproduce the current 2025 envelope. No basements are exposed or exported. Existing church and seven-storey apartment are retained. Placement is a municipal-footprint alignment with approximately 2.5 m working uncertainty, not a legal survey. Proposed finished floors differ from current bare-earth terrain at some edges; current civil grading is unverified. A shallow foundation conceals the gap, without changing documented floors, roof datums or roads.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ.

exterior approximation; after-image corroborates visible design, not every concealed detail

Independent cross-gable heritage/addition reconstruction with wrap porch; four 2017 elevations plus supplied finished exterior photograph.

Optional future-only design study; no current completed exterior confirmed

March 2025 four-elevation proposed-addition/colour-option study; scaled to existing frontage context.

exterior approximation; after-image corroborates visible design, not every concealed detail

Independent source-photo front and dormer/porch roof study; footprint-registered main house only.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

The City summarizes ten storeys; original drawings label eleven levels including a mezzanine. The roof datum is 35.95 m; it is not a verified height to the top of the mechanical enclosure.

Independent approximate plan-derived massing; 2025 dimensioned main body and 2026 rooftop height limits

The main body follows the 2025 dimensions, with the newer approved rooftop-height allowance. The precise 2026 rooftop shape, balcony edges and placement remain approximate. The active site-plan entry lists 315 homes and older adopted material lists 378; that difference still needs confirmation. Demolition / early works do not establish a completed tower.

Geometry conflict or version uncertainty; inspect evidence

The published 70- and 60-storey scheme has a tallest tower of 226.1 m. Municipal SP 24-41 meshes instead carry 165.25 and 141.35 m. This major discrepancy is unresolved and could represent a newer design or model error. Do not assert that either version is definitive.

Current plan footprints and source roof levels; source discrepancies qualified

The current plan supports the three footprints. Older Lot 1 and 2 elevations and the January 2026 Lot 3 elevation provide the roof levels, which differ slightly from the newer summary heights. The drawings also disagree on two versus three storeys because of split levels. Roof forms are approximate; windows, doors, stairs and basements are omitted. Placement has about 3 m working uncertainty. Only displayed foundations meet the dated terrain, up to about 2.5 m below planned grades; roads, source roof levels and upper floors remain unchanged. This is not certified site grading.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Old age is not cancellation. Storey-count differences in photo captions are not sufficient to revise geometry. Site-plan identity SP 21-102 links the City model to the site.

Approximate zoning-envelope study traced from the official OLT RA5-66 schedule: 95 m / 29-storey tower, 16.8 m / four-storey areas, and 5.1 m / one-storey front stepback. Horizontal outlines and grade are approximate; this is not the finished architectural design.

This is a permitted-height study from the Tribunal schedule. The 95 m tower and lower base limits are verified; exact architectural outlines, finishes and ground placement remain approximate. The older municipal proxy is removed. Physical construction and completion are not established.

Survey-registered plan-derived schematic envelope

The open ground floor, six plan-visible support columns, second-floor notch and upper-front terraces are retained as simplified geometry. The mechanical enclosure follows the roof plan, using the labelled maximum 40.80 m. Minor equipment, arched facade frames, raised parapets and articulation within the enclosure are omitted. Terrace slab thickness is a 0.18 m display convention; footprints and deck elevations come from the source. The older rental building 92-749 is hidden in the illustrated future and retained only as dated municipal-baseline context. Demolition is reported underway, but its extent is not mapped; no completed clearance or new-building construction is implied. The file was published under the November 2025 resubmission, but its drawing export stamp is December 12, 2025.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ.

Municipalparcel-registered architecturalplan-derived schematic envelope

The site plan and elevation support twelve homes and the main mansard forms. Windows, dormers, porches and small roof details remain simplified, with roughly 1 m placement uncertainty. The separate statistics sheet lists thirteen homes, so the clear 7 + 5 site-plan count is used. Approval and construction are not established.

plan-derived model

July 2025 proposal, under review. Main dimensions and layered envelopes follow A 110 and the planning schedule; balconies, facade divisions, ground recesses and exact parapets are omitted. Position is registered through four surveyed existing houses to unmodified City geometry (centroid fit residuals 0.14–0.25 m; allow ±1 m overall position). Plan outlines are traced, approximately ±0.25 m. Overall 110.445 m dimension is corroborated as 110.4 m in the planning schedule. The elevation absolute-level tags disagree by about 1.8 m with that dimension; this envelope follows the overall dimension, not those tags. A 110 labels the western upper terrace as the 33-storey roof whereas the schedule labels 32: the drawn one-floor setback is shown, with its precise transition elevation unresolved. Existing heritage corner is retained; no existing meshes are altered by this asset.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ. Storeys array gives the documented range, not an inferred tower-by-tower distribution.

Geometry conflict or version uncertainty; inspect evidence

Use the architectural site plan for footprint validation. No independently verified overall metric heights are asserted.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Do not treat topping out as occupancy. City massing is the proposal source, with final architectural detail unverified.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ.

Zoning-envelope study · architectural form unverified

This shows the Tribunal’s permitted height zones, not final architectural floor plates. Placement and grade remain approximate. Windows, balconies and roof design are not invented. Site-plan and holding conditions still need checking; demolition is not permission to build the towers.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Retain legacy source13-11416 only as qualified planned envelope. Do not claim it is the currently built structure or promote full mass into construction mode without structural progress evidence. No arbitrary height revision from a forum-title change. Peel forecasts Q2 2028; the City programme still forecasts fall 2027. These are expected dates, not completion confirmation.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

The current City clarification reports no recent activity/current application, while the June 2026 inventory retains an older entry. This conflict does not establish official cancellation. The historical geometry is uncertain.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ.

Three current public-plan envelopes; unit/approval-version confirmation pending. Roof levels primary verified, notched outlines independently traced, facade and roof equipment omitted.

The three footprints are registered to the exact application boundary. Roof and floor levels come from the posted drawings. Their grades are about 4–5 m above dated terrain, so footprint-confined display bases support the buildings; roads and terrain are unchanged. Minor contours, balconies and finishes remain simplified. The 153-versus-141 home-count and approval-version differences still need confirmation. Nearby low-rise housing in the city overview is exact, dated 2024 City geometry; it is not a new survey of current conditions.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ.

Latest geometry unavailable in source model

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ. Boundary and low-rise subdivision amendments only; no tower massing inferred.

Duplicate or superseded source geometry excluded; inspect replacement evidence

The older City mesh is based on a 29-storey proposal, with a 90.3 m field matching the old level-29 elevation. Exclude that superseded geometry until the 24-storey plan is reconstructed; expected construction dates do not prove work has begun.

2026 plan-traced stepped massing; inferred façade/upper enclosure

The proposal follows the March 17, 2026 stepped 16-storey plan. The 48.15 m value is the top slab of the last residential floor, not ultimate roof height. Façades and the upper roof enclosure are inferred. The retained 13-storey apartment uses an approximate 39.12 m roof and photo-informed balconies. Current approval, delivery and as-built measurements remain unconfirmed; placement has about 3 m working uncertainty.

Duplicate or superseded source geometry excluded; inspect replacement evidence

Existing City mesh matches old 63/93/96 m heights; latest revised massing requires comparison. Do not label snapshot as current. Live landing page returned 404 although indexed; PDF accessible.

Site marked; the new building needs a reliable current site plan and elevations before its shape is added.

Exact current proposed exterior/footprint/dimensions not yet verified. Existing municipal roofs are context, not the new design.

Source-registered settlement zoning-envelope schematic

This is the maximum permitted settlement zoning envelope, not an architectural design or a verified finished facade. Contours follow the actual settlement diagram rather than stretching a superseded City model. The height-zone surfaces are independently extruded; coincident hidden surfaces remain. Cladding, railings, detailed balconies, structural openings and landscaping are not inferred. Building base is the median sampled Ontario DTM grade, not a legally calculated or approved established grade. Relative maximum heights are taken verbatim from the governing diagram. The July 10, 2025 order labels the 33-storey height 105.7 m; a later City surrounding-development report lists 107.7 m. This model uses the governing order and preserves that discrepancy explicitly. The order permits rooftop appurtenances up to 7.5 m above the height limit, but no footprint is delineated, so they are omitted. A maximum projection permission does not establish a constructed rooftop form. The existing 28-storey apartment 92-2023 is retained. The settlement replaces the obsolete 38-storey source geometry. The podium courtyard curve is sampled from the zoning diagram; it is a simplified maximum buildable perimeter.

Latest geometry unavailable in source model

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ. City URL names 2025 file numbers but page title names 2015 file numbers; project identity requires caution.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ.

Navigation/evidence record; current redesigned geometry unavailable

Historical City records describe a four-storey scheme and a13.72m flat roof request in2022. Those dimensions are not adopted as the2026redesign. No cancellation or confirmed current completion is established.

Geometry conflict or version uncertainty; inspect evidence

The earlier 42/40-storey design is superseded. The City report gives 131.5 m and 104.7 m. The downloaded City mesh tops out below those dimensions and needs replacement or clarification before claiming current geometry.

Plan-derived schematic with per-floor outlines

Current 2026 floor outlines were extracted from actual PDF vector room fills; drafting gaps were closed by 0.1524 m and internal rooms filled to create exterior massing. Curves were sampled; outline simplification tolerance 0.046 m. All nine upper levels, major fourth/seventh-floor terraces, balcony recesses and mechanical enclosure follow source geometry. Balcony guardrails, glazed facades, small balcony slabs and interior rooms are omitted. Ground-floor west/east bodies follow the latest publicly linked original ground drawing, dated October 3, 2024, cross-checked against the March 2026 site-plan entrance arrangement. This lower-level revision remains less certain. Eight entrance-column centres come from that ground drawing; 0.6 m diameters are illustrative. No structural engineering accuracy is claimed. Stair roof footprints come from the current roof drawing; their 118.2 m top is transcribed from the corresponding section silhouette approximately 0.5 m below the labelled main mechanical roof, with ±0.3 m uncertainty. The sloped site retains source floor/roof ASL levels. Ground levels are simplified at 86.0 m west and 85.4 m east; no broad regrading of the natural ravine is implied.

Existing municipal project massing retained; current facade detail unverified

Municipal massing is already in the viewer. Native vendor interactive model is a public visual reference, not a licensed downloadable asset. Developer construction25% is reported progress, not a measured built-height percentage. City field heights, not newly verified total architectural heights. Older drawings and some forum storey conventions differ; retain source extents pending current elevations.

source-derived distinct 56/50-floor tower forms; interpolated south rotation and illustrative facade detail

This is a source-derived architectural visualization, not a certified as-built model. Exact intermediate south floor rotations are not available in the primary drawings: smooth bounded 1–8-degree increments interpolate the verified floor 1/24/40 anchors and 209-degree total. South plan scaled by the City captured maximum silhouette diameter; north fits the documented elliptical plate to captured roof samples. These are measured source fits, not dimensioned construction drawings. Tower centres retain City captured polygon centroids. Estimated model-registration tolerance±2 m, plan scale/profile tolerance±2 m; these are modelling allowances, not surveyed confidence intervals. Nominal architectural heights follow current CTBUH; City captured height extents differ by 3.66 m/4.21 m. Ground datum is retained from City and its absolute vertical accuracy is unverified. Typical floor elevations and roof-zone subdivisions are inferred from published highest-occupied/top heights; they are not a complete elevation schedule. Balcony slab thickness 0.20 m, guard height 1 m and glazing setbacks are illustrative, as are material appearance and mullion detail. South mechanical roof uses the unchanged City plan outline, with its vertical placement reconstructed; north exact roof machinery is omitted.

Source-derived architectural model from approved plans and developer references; approximate detail

Independent reconstruction from approved City plans, developer floorplate references and GIS parcel registration; not a certified as-built or native architect model. The final 32-storey program and current 109.1 m CTBUH architectural top are retained. Intermediate floor elevations, mechanical-screen subdivisions, balcony guards, slab thicknesses, façade joints and mullions are approximate. Plan tracing and placement carry approximately 1–2 m working tolerance, not surveyed confidence. Current public Tile 72 was checked and contains no Alba; no existing municipal source IDs are suppressed.

Retained City tower identified by current parcel and address; current detailed architecture unverified

Existing City component 103-1083 is the Greenpark tower at 950 Aerodrome Avenue: its footprint contains the official City address point and lies wholly within SP 24/015. It is retained unchanged, not added again. The City application lists a 43-storey tower; Greenpark markets 42 floors of suites, so the overall/suite counts refer to different conventions. Source 143.81 m Bldg_Hght is not independently verified final height. Other Greenpark components stay in the Lakeview parent: the source has three tall bodies, while the current application describes four towers; the fourth-body discrepancy is unresolved.

Latest geometry unavailable in source model

Place in the Cooksville section of the atlas. No exact architectural height was verified.

15 approximate source-plan envelopes; source heights estimated; two contextual rows lack current application assignment

Approximate marketing-plan-derived townhome envelopes, not surveyed architectural models. Seven June footprints and three additional highlighted blocks in the currently linked image are registered through two City street junctions and four common roof centroids. The image scale bar conflicts with City junction spacing by about 25%; City coordinates control the model scale. Estimated placement ±10 m and roof-outline tolerance ±3 m are interpretive, not statistical confidence bounds. The ten retained envelopes use an estimated 13 m maximum with ±3.5 m uncertainty, derived from about 6.2 m registered bay width and roughly 2.1:1 height-to-bay proportions in the official illustrative facade. No published dimensional height was found. Roofs, balconies, basements and facade articulation are omitted; grey marketing roofs are retained from the June version, not independently confirmed current building drawings. Five additional grey roof envelopes shown in Caivan’s June 2026 marketing plan, registered using the unchanged two-junction transform of the retained ten-envelope model. All five lie inside City parcel 33912100. Three eastern rows lie within current SP 25/68 W 1 (Block 8, 88 townhouses); two western contextual rows lie outside the reviewed current application polygons and have no verified active-file assignment. The grey background artwork is not a final architectural drawing or confirmed construction phase. Use as explicitly uncertain future context. The 13 m display height remains the original Aura estimate with ±3.5 m uncertainty; placement ±10 m and outline ±3 m remain interpretive bounds. No number of dwellings, exact metre height, occupancy date, detailed roofs or final facade is inferred from these envelopes. Existing ten-envelope geometry remains unchanged.

Checked source-based exterior study; dimensions and finishes remain qualified.

Exact dated City surfaces retained. Added facade details are estimates; the coach roof does not resolve every photographed step-down. No demolition-complete claim is made for the omitted eastern garage. Reference credit: Reference photography: Industryous Photography; Existing building surfaces: City of Mississauga.

Retained City Block 1/Branthaven massing, current architecture version unverified

Eight existing City components are wholly contained within current SP 22/056 Block 1, explicitly described as Branthaven in the City layer. This identifies the retained Birch-era condo and six townhome rows without constructing duplicates. Current detailed architecture and completion remain unverified; the site plan was approved September 3, 2026; physical construction remains unverified. Pier House is separately registered at Block 4 and is not a reason to remove this older geometry without cancellation evidence.

reference-derived supplemental model

Existing status and 25/34 storeys are corroborated by primary sources. Approximate 79.9/106.5 m vertical envelopes come from a secondary catalogue, not a current surveyed elevation. Tower plates are interpreted from the developer amenity illustration registered to current City mapped footprint limits. Allow about 5 m for tower position/contour interpretation; this is not a statistical accuracy claim. The 14 m podium, floor divisions, balcony projections, vertical fins and roof enclosures are simplified reference-based estimates. Exact as-built facade and slab dimensions have not been obtained. Nine selected native City LOD 2 scene leaves and the inherited municipal model do not contain either tower. Existing neighbouring source geometry is retained. No downloadable architect-native model was located.

Geometry conflict or version uncertainty; inspect evidence

Construction commencement was not confirmed. No official cancellation was found. Latest explicit reviewed forecast is 2030 occupancy in the year-end 2025 planning table. Source geometry remains a phase-matching issue; a financial unit count is not an exact footprint or facade source.

Dated plan-derived concept; storey-based vertical estimate

Only the adopted CURRENT right-hand plan was traced; superseded P/Q/U layouts on the comparison left are excluded. Concept-visible podium wings, open courtyards, curved O 2 outline and Campus terraces are simplified. Windows, balconies, doors, roof equipment, cladding, landscaping and parcel grading are not invented. Terrace bands are reduced to the labelled principal podium steps because the source raster cannot support precise intermediate contours. The concept was adopted in 2024. November 2025 committee approval supports implementing those permissions; detailed 2025/2026 zoning PDFs returned access errors, so their precise plan contours were not independently compared.

Municipal source geometry identified and retained

Municipal award report identifies Brightwater I at 215 Lakeshore West. Source footprints align with C 1 and H 1 on the current adopted masterplan.

source-based exterior improvement

Independent stepped civic exterior from City 2020 roof/site boards, matched to 2024 City footprint and completed-building photographs; schematic façade/PV detail.

Independent U-shaped approximate massing using municipal horizontal registration and current seven-storey evidence

Peel confirms seven storeys and 150 homes. The U-shaped reference uses a provisional municipal footprint and a secondary-reported 27.5 m height; a current dimensioned elevation is still needed. It appears only as a future envelope. The real building remains unfinished in October photographs.

plan-derived models

June 2026 unapproved expansion, separate from earlier B 3. Dimensioned main envelope and five-storey podium, with height through mechanical penthouse. Survey control registration; allow ±1 m placement. Small partial level-17/18 terrace cuts, balcony projections, entrance recesses and facade divisions are omitted. Floor bands and materials are schematic. B 6 mechanical silhouette is traced from A-B 6-304, approximately ±0.3 m; B 4/B 5 MPH follow the rectangular plan envelope. Datum treated as local UTM 17 NAD 83; no sub-metre geodetic claim. The old components 73-4291 and 73-4293 conflict with the June 2026 B 5 layout and are excluded. Separate B 3 (73-4292) remains a violet, height-uncertain municipal envelope: the current site plan labels 25 storeys, while the old mesh records 52.1 m.

The playground landmark is added to its mapped park. It is an approximate exterior study, not a complete playground or engineering model.

Photo-based interpretation; member dimensions, fine connections and hidden surfaces remain approximate. Source images remain private. The mapped ground is display geometry, not a surveyed playground level. This depicts the log landmark. The community-centre building is a separate known gap; its roof footprint is verified but a reliable height has not been recovered. Reference help and design: Earthscape Play.

Architect-supplied schematic massing; georegistration and base grades remain approximate.

A 100 and native geometry use 82.75 m for A 1, while A 200 labels 87.75 m. Native geometry is retained. No detailed facade or construction approval is implied.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ.

Architect-supplied Step 4 design geometry; seven towers, podiums and rooftop structures

Native proposal geometry includes seven towers, podiums, setbacks and rooftop structures. It is a design proposal, not approved or completed construction. The source design elevations are retained; underground geometry is clipped to the atlas terrain. The terrain is approximate and the vertical datum is not survey-certified. Some drawing title blocks retain older issue labels. The Step 4 cover letter, September 2026 draft PJR and September 22 public presentation support the seven-tower, 3,171-home version. Final facade finishes and construction dates remain unconfirmed. The display model is not a watertight fabrication solid. Original engineering files are retained privately.

Municipal source geometry identified and retained

Retain City 2024 LiDAR component 93-765, matched to masterplan D 1. The informal name “The Kee” was not supported by the reviewed primary sources and must not be used. Captured roof 108.79 m ASL is source geometry, not a new survey.

Optional earlier-plan exterior study. The current 51-home design still needs verified drawings.

This optional model uses measured controls from the December 2023 50-home plan and newer exterior references. The current project has 51 homes. The 13.65 m height, grade, facade divisions and smaller details are estimates; this is not its final approved or as-built architecture. Only the planned exterior appears in the future view, with alternate studies enabled.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

The developer's construction confirmation supersedes the municipal Proposed label for 16 Elm, SP 20-103. Counts of 35 and 40 storeys are secondary crosschecks; 50 is primary. CTBUH's approximate 170 m was not used as a verified architectural height.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

2026 vector-plan footprints replace all 17 older City source components. Published proposed ground-floor levels are used where provided. Revised metric roofs are not published: heights use the older elevations and documented 2.95 m typical floor interval, with retained podium and 5 m mechanical allowances explicitly estimated. Allow about ±5 m vertically and ±2 m placement. These are schematic envelopes without facade detail, not verified construction geometry.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Municipal SP 22-60 meshes carry 232, 185.05, 185.05 and 125.45 m and appear to reflect the earlier 70-storey tallest tower. The newer 72-storey variant lacks a verified updated height here. March 2026 permit and construction dates are projections, not proof of groundbreaking. A separate September 29 by-law redesignates a City-owned Kariya parkland parcel. Its mapped boundary has not been added here, and it is not treated as a tower approval.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

The four towers have different completion states. CVU/CTBUH calls the tallest tower EX 4 and the shortest EX 3; current marketing uses EX 3 and EXS. These are aliases, not extra towers. Source full geometry is a supplied design and is not as-built proof. Native material nodes cross phases; EXS requires triangle-level spatial classification. EX 3 now follows the architect’s 66-storey description. The former 72-storey/232 m form is historical; current metre height is unverified. Its future blue crown is a retained design interpretation, not proof of completion.

The playground landmark is added to its mapped park. It is an approximate exterior study, not a complete playground or engineering model.

Photo-based interpretation; member dimensions, fine connections and hidden surfaces remain approximate. Source images remain private. The mapped ground is display geometry, not a surveyed playground level. Reference help and design: Earthscape Play.

Registered exterior study with a fitted display forecourt; actual site grading remains unverified.

Approximate exterior study, not a measured as-built model. The City footprint, orientation and source floor are retained. Tower height, lower roofs and facade details are estimated from the shared exterior references. Small entrance landings and the forecourt are fitted to the displayed ground so the doors are clear; this is a schematic display correction, not surveyed site grading. Exact site levels and hidden surfaces remain unverified. The City source calls this 1385 Winding Trail, while the official station address is 1355. Original award PDF and interior material remain private.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ.

Modelled reference reconstruction: parcel-registered stepped wings and open courtyard; dimensions approximate

Approximate independent reconstruction from Tridel site-plan/terrace artwork, registered to City SP 21/168 parcel. Two 19-storey wings and courtyard are source-supported. 61.7 m display maximum (60.8 m roof plus 0.9 m parapet) is an estimate, not a published height; height tolerance ±6 m, placement ±5 m and outline ±3 m are interpretive bounds. 5 m entrance level, 3.10 m upper floor spacing, balcony/slab/parapet thicknesses, terrace taper spacing and exterior detailing are inferred. This shows the planned finished form of a project under construction, not a measured current construction stage.

source-based exterior improvement

approximate shells for 705, 745 and 795 Hazelhurst. The September 2026 brochure advertises 36 ft CLEAR INTERNAL height for 745 and 795, not exterior roof height. The clear height of 705 is not established by this brochure. The 13.13 m roof and 14 m service top are explicit visual approximations pending elevations. 745 is 893 × 288 ft; 795 is 818 × 263 ft. The advertised 72, 787 sq ft available at 795 is a portion, not the entire shell. 705 follows the actual City 2024 mapped footprint. Office corner layout, façade divisions, doors, joints and rooftop services are estimated from supplied photographs, with grey atlas finishes. “Immediate” for 745 and “Q 3 2026” for 795 are leasing/delivery statements, not independently verified occupancy dates. The brochure photograph shows complete exterior shells but its capture date is unspecified. Placement uses City address points with approximately 6 m working uncertainty; it is not legal-survey accuracy.

Latest geometry unavailable in source model

Include the open park in the baseline inventory. Its completed reclamation outline is not fully verified in current terrain geometry: the City municipal boundary is older and the park layer has no matching polygon. Do not invent land from the published area. Access is via Marie Curtis Park; do not depict an unbuilt western through-connection as open.

Municipal source geometry identified and retained

Retain unchanged completed municipal mesh 72-6175; assign to Keystone dossier. No duplicate supplemental tower mesh needed. 81.42 m and 71.90 m are derived from captured vertices above the shared lowest source vertex, not verified architectural height dimensions. Do not replace separate dossier architectural height unknown values with these.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

The builder licence cancellation in August 2026 is not evidence that the project was cancelled. Early 2027 occupancy remains a forecast.

Latest geometry unavailable in source model

The district can be represented as a planning area. Specific office building geometry has not been verified.

Geometry conflict or version uncertainty; inspect evidence

The current City overview projects 12,000 homes, developer marketing advertises up to 11,000, and the provincial ceiling remains 16,000. These are different quantities, not a resolved final build-out. The 2019 concept is not used to invent buildings on unverified parcels. Twenty-six retained City components are now cross-referenced to Block 1/Branthaven, Block 2, Greenpark SP 24/015 and Block 15. Current additions cover Harbourwalk, Pier House/Block 4, South Banks and Aura reference envelopes. Greenpark’s fourth tall-body discrepancy, Innovation District parcel architecture, remaining village blocks and final public-space details remain unresolved. These additions do not mean the complete village is modelled.

Retained City source massing matched to active application parcel; current architecture unverified

Existing municipal massing is retained unchanged and matched spatially to the current active City application. Source height is a model attribute, not verified current final architecture. Do not add duplicate buildings or infer an actual completion date.

Retained City source massing matched to active application parcel; current architecture unverified

Existing municipal massing is retained unchanged and matched spatially to the current active City application. Source height is a model attribute, not verified current final architecture. Do not add duplicate buildings or infer an actual completion date.

Latest geometry unavailable in source model

Council has endorsed a guide and further study, but has not approved final design, funding or construction. Artist views and illustrative 20-storey rental and 9-storey office concepts are not approved architecture. Keep any vision study optional.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

CTBUH architectural heights differ from UrbanToronto's 197.81 m and 60 storeys. The City's 61-storey figure is a marketing count. Preserve the distinction.

photo-and-plan-derived approximate crown shell

Municipal lower capture remains unchanged. Upper contour interpolated from published plans; crown now represented by a photo-derived stepped silhouette anchored to 260.29 m. Intermediate crown dimensions approximate and mechanical cavities omitted.

Published-plan envelope added; approximate placement and maximum roof profile

The recorded-construction asset uses the sourced level-41 elevation, with an approximate vertical cut and explicit date. Completion is a forecast, distinct from phased occupancy.

native developer interaction proxy; unverified architectural envelope

Native developer interaction proxy georegistered to community diagram; exact architectural height unknown. Native 117.87-unit extent is not a verified building height. Future-only; actual floor 27 progress not inferred from this envelope.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

The June 2026 City register describes 58 storeys. The architect page describes an earlier 55-storey version. Municipal SP 22-145 geometry has a 186.85 m tower height attribute; retain its exact surfaces. CTBUH explicitly estimates 194 m and that estimate is not a replacement height.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Municipal SP 24-30 geometry attributes are 163.16 and 146.91 m. CTBUH's 175 and 159 m were not accepted as verified measurements. Assign individual tower names only after checking their positions against a site plan.

Checked source-based exterior study; dimensions and finishes remain qualified.

Photo-informed exterior details; pane spacing, fins, doorway and rooftop frame dimensions remain estimates. No source photographs are used as textures. Reference credit: Photo reference assistance: Tom Arban Photography Inc.; Exterior reference assistance: Mark Walsh / Prelco.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Square One Block 14, SP 20-99, may correspond to this project. Its 73.1 m mesh requires a spatial and drawing match. Current web sources did not establish the final architectural height.

Latest geometry unavailable in source model

The 77 m maximum belongs to a concept, not final building designs. Historical renderings must remain labelled conceptual. The marina environmental approval is a separate process.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Native City source geometry retained. Current developer community pages confirm completion. The July 2025 developer article says 48/38 storeys, while Amacon’s portfolio, its November update and the architect’s completion announcement use 50/38; the existing 50/38 record is retained with that discrepancy disclosed. CVU’s 171 m and 130 m heights are estimates, not measured architectural dimensions. Exact completion and occupancy days are unverified.

Latest geometry unavailable in source model

Retain the older approval as uncertain rather than cancelled. Confirm the precise block and any subsequent name or design change before placing geometry.

The playground landmark is added to its mapped park. It is an approximate exterior study, not a complete playground or engineering model.

Photo-based interpretation; member dimensions, fine connections and hidden surfaces remain approximate. Source images remain private. The mapped ground is display geometry, not a surveyed playground level. Reference help and design: Earthscape Play.

Coverage not documented

The City confirms 15 and 34 storeys. The 111.9 m tall envelope is an unverified published catalogue value; the 53 m shorter envelope and 12 m podium are illustrative estimates. Allow roughly ±5 m, not survey confidence. Plan registration relates older source contours to the 2024 mapped podium. Exact current balconies, roof plant and facade details are not reconstructed. The Ontario 2023 DSM catalog record returned NoData here; no LiDAR-derived building height is claimed. The seven native municipal scene leaves inspected around this site did not contain these two towers. No existing source IDs are suppressed.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Hospital tower retained as future construction; completed garage belongs in existing context. City massing height 129.775 m is source geometry, not an independently verified maximum.

19 reference-derived townhome row groups; approximate roofs, elevations and facade details

Independent approximate reference reconstruction: 19 row-building envelopes traced from the publicly reproduced Pier House marketing site plan, registered to three City road junctions and contained in current SP 25/48 Block 4. Three storeys and pitched/gabled roof character are corroborated by the current Branthaven brochure. The 9.45 m eaves/11.95 m ridge are display estimates, not published architectural dimensions; ±2.5 m height, ±3 m placement and ±3 m outline tolerances are interpretive. Bay spacing, balconies, roof pitch and facade details are illustrative; do not treat the geometry as a unit-by-unit or permit model. Plan future-release rows are retained, not asserted to be completed or all currently on sale. No completion date verified. Approval does not confirm construction or replace the plan-based geometry limits.

Current source-plan approximation; see project model caveat.

Gemma tower and podium remain source massing, with approximate facade detail. The separate SP 22 99 south scheme at 10/30 Watergarden Drive and 220 Little Creek Road appears only as an uncertain future proposal; its completion is not established.

The project is recorded, with a link to the City’s construction update. Its new bridge needs reliable deck and alignment details before it is drawn.

Source-supported deck datum, width, abutment locations and final alignment needed. Avoid altering nearbyGOrail or draping the new road/trail into water.

Latest geometry unavailable in source model

25 storeys is a maximum, not a complete tower schedule. Use MOPA 204 and the latest plan rather than the earlier 3,700-home assumption. Master plan endorsement does not establish that every building is approved for construction.

Existing municipal buildings already present; search name added.

Existing source geometry retained; July 2025 brochures are historical references, not proof of a new design revision or measured architectural height.

17 parcel-registered townhome blocks with reference-derived cross-gables; estimated heights and schematic facades

Seventeen townhome blocks are reconstructed from a parcel-registered artist concept; the cross-gables follow the original image references. Heights, roof proportions and details remain schematic, with estimated uncertainties of ±3 m in height, ±4 m in placement and ±2 m in outlines; these are modelling judgments, not certified tolerances. No native BIM model or approved metric roof drawings were supplied.

Source-based finished-exterior approximation; alignment and grade remain estimated

Independent exterior study from City plans and supplied references. Scale, roof heights and map placement are approximate. The 12.8 m roof estimate is unverified; the neighbouring-footprint registration check differs by 10.4 m. The display is trimmed to approximate existing terrain and uses an illustrative footing; actual finished grading is unknown. This full-design envelope appears only in Future mode, not as recorded construction progress.

Optional dated 2021 reference; current exact geometry and roof-height relationship unverified

approximation of HPA A 100/A 003 revision 3, April 23 2021, not a current approved or as-built design. A 100 shows stepped podium roofs and tower terraces that the retained flat municipal proxies omit. The actual north roof contours are extracted from drawing vectors. Intermediate tower outlines are inferred by fitting the A 003 plate-area programme and A 100 setback directions; the southern intermediate profiles reuse the shared typology as a mirrored inference. Both green roof surfaces are actually source-vector-traced; the southern rooftop envelope is adjusted to contain its supplied roof outline. Ground podium coverage and enclosed volume below each roof remain approximate without floor plans. Window spacing/frames and finishes are reference approximations; no current facade schedule was supplied. Printed roof EL 335.55/365.55 and roof/height comparisons suggest an additional 7.5 m roof enclosure above the quoted 175.25/205.25 m heights, but elevations/sections and Burnside C 200 revision 5 are needed to confirm the grade, height definition and ASL interpretation. The source-based study uses those printed roof levels and an inferred EL 152.80 grade; it does not silently change the project catalogue heights. Mechanical/mezzanine and typical-floor elevations are inferred to fit the total, not measured levels. Open roof zones are retained and no exposed basements are exported. Roads are untouched. The applications remain open and applicant-paused, not officially cancelled; no start or completion timeline is confirmed.

New public-plan-derived schematic now available

Schematic reconstruction of the submitted T 1 building from a published architects–Alliance roof/site plan. Adjacent Block 5 towers are conceptual and are not included. Roof-zone heights follow printed labels; horizontal outlines are digitised from a raster. Three public intersection controls establish location; estimated ±5 m placement and ±1 m plan-contour uncertainty. Facades and entrances are not reconstructed.

Latest geometry unavailable in source model

Oxford's 2025 account gives 48 buildings, including 41 residential buildings; the original architect's plan has 37 towers. These are different program definitions or versions. Do not invent towers from these totals or duplicate the separately listed phases.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

The current Daniels fact sheet lists STAK 36 at 48 storeys; older Oxford retail material says 44. Dialogue is marketed at 37, while some architectural records count 36. Municipal mesh 63-6238 is the dated 2024 capture of both towers. Remove overlapping proposal components 63-6225, 63-6226 and 63-6227 from the reviewed future. Final roof geometry remains unverified.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

SP 19-144 is described as two towers of 41 and 31 storeys in the June 2026 City register. Earlier marketing and UrbanToronto describe other versions. Four retained municipal components form two remaining tower and podium pairs. Components 63-6225, 63-6226 and 63-6227 actually overlap the completed first-phase towers and are excluded as duplicates. Current storeys do not establish precise architectural heights.

Source-based pitched-nave approximation; exact metric roof elevations unavailable

The City source presents a low flat roof where supplied photos show a steep A-frame. This separate pilot interprets the nave with an estimated 14 m ridge (working range 11.5–16.5 m) and inferred roof pitch. Native lower-wing dimensions and grade remain the starting context. Exact metric elevations and rear façade details are unresolved. This is a schematic, not a certified as-built model.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Expected dates are not a confirmed start. Preserve the existing residence and add only the proposed infill geometry.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ.

Existing municipal buildings already present; search name added.

Existing source geometry retained; July 2025 brochures are historical references, not proof of a new design revision or measured architectural height.

Latest geometry unavailable in source model

Include as existing context, rather than a future addition.

Latest geometry unavailable in source model

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ. Temporarily paused proposal; do not depict as approved or under construction. Retain only with that status visible.

Latest geometry unavailable in source model

Address coordinates are approximate map pins. City snapshot meshes are source massing, not construction drawings; latest approvals and final detailed architecture may differ. Separate warehouse application from the paused data centre. Do not automatically apply the digital-infrastructure moratorium to distribution centres.

Source geometry available; current detail may differ

The earlier 25-storey, 91.6 m description is obsolete. The latest north elevation labels 82,600 mm from established grade. City geometry at 77.1 m appears to omit the mechanical roof and should be described as a simplified source massing.

Municipal source geometry identified and retained

Source footprint matches G 1. Nine-storey-scale body is already represented: captured ground 81.82, main roof 115.12 and upper roof 120.62 m ASL. Retain this geometry without stretching.

Duplicate or superseded source geometry excluded; inspect replacement evidence

City snapshot names the site 149 Dundas West (SP 22-162) and retains the former 32-storey tower. Even the June 2026 pipeline description repeats 18/20/32 storeys and 966 homes. The later binding order controls; exclude superseded snapshot geometry.

Approximate form; metre heights unverified

Current permits verify 431 homes and eight, eight and nine storeys. The reproduced plan provides an approximate layout, with about 10 m placement uncertainty. Metre heights are illustrative, using 3.1 m per storey with a ±0.35 m allowance; no measured roof height is claimed. The violet future envelope is not a survey of unfinished construction.

Connected curved podium and distinct source-traced balcony profiles for both towers

Approximate reconstruction from published plans and photographs, not surveyed or as-built geometry. The connected podium, tower orientation and separate park-facing balcony outlines are source-referenced. Only explicitly labelled lower transition-floor variations are reconstructed; no repeating wave is invented. Existing tower centres and heights are retained; exact shorter-tower height and occupancy remain unverified. Voya is adjacent to Zonta Meadows, but the unnamed commenter’s intended building is not confirmed.

Checked source-based exterior study; dimensions and finishes remain qualified.

Column feet follow the displayed terrain; canopy height and frame dimensions remain photo-based estimates. The City campus and ground are unchanged. Reference photographs: Riley Snelling.

Checked source-based exterior study; dimensions and finishes remain qualified.

Photo-informed roof and exterior interpretation; fine dimensions remain estimates. This does not reproduce the Buddha sculpture. The neighbouring Chaithya is a separate unconfirmed-size study. Reference credit: References: Bhante Saranapala / West End Buddhist Temple; Base outline and height: City of Mississauga.

Latest geometry unavailable in source model

Include as existing context, rather than a future addition.